Open Community
Post to this Blog
« June 2006 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30
You are not logged in. Log in
Politics in Israel
Saturday, 17 June 2006
Olmert's plan crowds Arabs, other foreigners into Jerusalem
Mood:  incredulous
Topic: Israeli Politicians
Column One: Olmert's plan for Jerusalem
Caroline Glick, THE JERUSALEM POST Jun. 15, 2006
www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1150355504853&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

During his tour this week of European capitals, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert
announced that in addition to Judea and Samaria, he plans to transfer a
number of neighborhoods in Jerusalem to Hamas. In his words, "Not all the
Arab neighborhoods will be part of the city in the future."
Olmert claims that taking these Arab neighborhoods out of Jerusalem's
municipal boundaries will strengthen the city. From a security perspective
this makes no sense since transferring Tzur Baher, Jebl Mukaber and Isawiya
to the Hamas-Fatah-Islamic Jihad-al-Qaida-Hizbullah-led Palestinian
Authority will place all the remaining neighborhoods in the city within
enemy rocket, mortar and even rifle range.

Olmert apparently thinks that partitioning the city will secure the Jewish
majority of the city. Yet, taking these neighborhoods out of the city will
actually endanger that majority.

Over the past few months, a team of American and Israeli researchers
conducted a demographic study of Jerusalem and its environs. Last year the
same researchers - Bennett Zimmerman, Roberta Seid, Michael Weiss and Yoram
Ettinger - conducted the first independent study of the Palestinian
population data published by the PA's Central Bureau of Statistics in 1997.
Their study exposed that the PA had inflated the number of Palestinians in
Judea, Samaria and Gaza by some 1.5 million or 50 percent. Olmert and his
colleagues in Kadima and the Labor Party have justified their plan to
surrender Judea and Samaria to Hamas on the basis of these inflated numbers
which falsely project that by 2015 there will be more Arabs than Jews
between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea.

The team's research methods and their findings were reviewed by the leading
American demographer Nicholas Eberstadt from the American Enterprise
Institute in Washington, DC. At the Herzliya Conference in January,
Eberstadt praised the team's research methods and stated that their
conclusions were "not only plausible but quite persuasive."

Their study showed that today Jews comprise 59 percent of the overall
population of the areas that include sovereign Israel, Judea and Samaria and
Gaza and 67 percent of the population of Judea, Samaria and sovereign
Israel. Far from becoming the minority by 2015, the group's projections show
that in 2025, Jews will comprise between 56-71 percent of the overall
population of Judea, Samaria and sovereign Israel. In other words, the team
showed that there is no demographic threat to Israel's Jewish majority.

The team began examining the demographic situation in Jerusalem and its
environs after Olmert first expressed his plan to partition the city as part
of his unilateral retreat policy. The team noted at the outset that Olmert's
claim - that by placing Arab neighborhoods outside the municipal boundaries
he would be reducing the Arab population of the capital by tens of
thousands - ignores the fact that Arabs can move. As legal residents of
Jerusalem these Arabs are under no obligation to remain in the neighborhoods
slotted for transfer to Hamas.

Indeed, since the government's intention to partition the city was made
clear by the route of the security fence, thousands of Arabs with Jerusalem
ID cards who had previously lived in Judea and in neighborhoods set to be
placed outside the city's boundaries started converging on the city.
Residents of Pisgat Ze'ev and Neveh Ya'acov relate that Arabs are moving
into their neighborhoods in droves. This is also the case in the city's Arab
neighborhoods not set for transfer to Hamas such as Beit Tzafafa, Wadi Joz
and Abu Tor. Rather than reduce the number of Arabs in the city, Olmert's
plan is just crowding the city's population into shrunken boundaries. At the
same time, by giving up all the reserve open lands around the city, he is
blocking all chance of municipal growth.
As Zimmerman and his team members note, in Jerusalem's current municipal
boundaries, 487,000 Jews make up 68% of the population and 231,000 Arabs
make up 32%. Fertility rates of the two populations are nearly identical,
with a Jewish fertility rate of 3.8 and an Arab fertility rate of 4.1 per
woman.

The team checked what would happen if, rather than partitioning the city,
Israel were to expand the boundaries of the city. They found that if Israel
were to extend the borders of the capital to include the Adumim bloc, the
Etzion bloc, the Adam bloc, the Givon bloc, Mevasseret Zion and its
satellite neighborhoods, the Tekoa area, Abu Dis and Bir Naballah and
incorporate all these communities' Jewish and Arab residents into the city,
Jerusalem's demographic balance would remain the same. The enlarged city
would have 704,000 or 68% Jewish residents and 335,000 or 32% Arab
residents.

The enlarged capital would have plenty of land reserves on which to build
new housing for both its Jewish and Arab residents. Retaining Israeli
control over the areas around Jerusalem's current boundaries would also
protect Bethlehem's status as a Christian city while Olmert's plan, which
places these areas under terrorist control, guarantees that Jesus's birth
city will become a Muslim majority city with all the religious and political
consequences that such a religious transformation would involve for the
Christian world. The study shows that the number of Arabs that would be
incorporated into the city if it were to expand its borders is smaller than
the number of Arabs incorporated into the city with its unification in 1967.
And it goes without saying that an enlarged Jerusalem would be safer than a
partitioned city with its removed sections under terrorist control.
In light of the study's findings, and given the deterioration of Israel's
national security situation in the wake of its retreat from Gaza last summer
and the recent reports of al-Qaida cells operating in Jerusalem, it is
impossible to avoid the conclusion that in configuring his retreat and
partition plan for the country's capital city, Olmert did not consider its
devastating repercussions on Jerusalem itself.
SO IF Olmert's planned retreat harms Jerusalem, what purpose does it serve?
The sole goal that Olmert's partition plan advances is that of attempting to
appease racist, anti-Jewish radical Islamic forces that claim that Jews have
no rights in Jerusalem. Indeed, at its core, Olmert's plan internalizes this
jihadist view by completely ignoring the security, municipal and demographic
concerns of the city's Jews and non-jihadist Arabs.

This Israeli internalization of the jihadist view of Jews in Jerusalem also
pervades the government's treatment of Jewish land purchases in eastern
Jerusalem. Last week Ha'aretz reported that a month ago the State's
Attorney, Eran Shendar, asked Police Inspector Yohanan Danino to undertake a
covert investigation of Ateret Cohanim - a non-profit organization that
works to bypass the Palestinian Authority's policy of defining land sales to
Jews as a capital offense for which dozens of Arabs have been murdered since
1994.

Shendar's instructions came after an Arab Jerusalemite named Muhammad
Marageh, who in the past worked for Ateret Cohanim, offered to attempt to
criminally implicate the organization in exchange for receiving state's
witness protection and, perhaps, money from the state. The Ha'aretz report
makes clear that Israel's chief prosecutor is so convinced that there is
something wrong with willing Arab sellers selling land to willing Jewish
buyers that apparently, without being presented with any evidence of
wrongdoing, he ordered the police to begin a secret criminal investigation
of the Jews.

This anti-Jewish view is similarly manifested in the police's indifference
to the fates of Arab land sellers. On April 12, the eve of Passover,
Jerusalem resident Muhammad Abu Al Hawa was tortured and murdered in Jericho
for the "crime" of selling a building in Abu Tor to Jews. The week before
his murder Israel's Channel 10 led prime time news broadcasts, on two
consecutive nights, with hysterical reports about the land sale. The reports
were precipitated by a court order for the police to evict illegal squatters
from the building to enable the legal owners to take possession of their
property - an eviction which Channel 10 filmed.

As I reported at the time, sources in Abu Tor stated that after the Channel
10 expose, it was only a question of time before Hawa was murdered. Those
sources also said that far from protecting Hawa, the police were suspected
of tipping off Channel 10's reporter on the scheduled eviction. This week,
the spokesman for the police's Samaria and Judea District responsible for
investigating Hawa's murder did not respond to repeated requests for
information on the status of the investigation.

THE GOVERNMENT'S treatment of the Greek Orthodox Patriarchate similarly
exposes its internalization of the anti-Semitic view that Jews have no
rights in eastern Jerusalem. Today there are two Patriarchs of the Greek
Orthodox Church: the legal Patriarch Irineos and the illegal de facto
Patriarch Theophilos. Last summer Ma'ariv reported that Irineos leased two
hotels near the Old City's Jaffa Gate to Jews. The story caused an uproar in
the Church, the PA and among Israeli Arabs. In its wake, Irineos was
illegally ejected from his position and his life has been under constant
threat.

The Church, together with Jordan's King Abdullah and PA Chairman Mahmoud
Abbas, selected Theophilos to replace him. Ahead of his appointment,
Theophilos promised Abdullah that he would operate in accordance with
Jordanian rather than Israeli law, meaning that he would uphold the
Jordanian legal prohibition of conducting land deals with Jews. Attorneys
and others involved in this issue claim that Theophilis also pledged to
Abbas that he would cancel the lease agreement for the hotels at the Jaffa
Gate.

In an interview with Al Quds newspaper on May 18, Theophilos said that he
was unable today to fulfill his pledges because the Israeli government has
yet to approve his appointment.

To force Israel's hand, Theophilos filed a petition with the Supreme Court
demanding that the government approve his appointment. The Supreme Court is
scheduled to hear the petition on July 19. The Jews involved in the Jaffa
Gate lease agreement and in other land agreements with the Greek Orthodox
Church, which owns vast landholdings in Jerusalem and throughout the
country, are deeply concerned about the government's likely response to the
petition. The government did nothing when Irineos was sacked although it is
legally bound to protect him and his position. Indeed, Israel has allowed
Theophilos to act as the de facto Patriarch.

The government's acceptance of the jihadist view that denies all Jewish
rights to Jerusalem is nowhere more evident than on the Temple Mount, which
since 1995 Israel has abandoned to the control of the PA's Mufti Ikrameh
Sabri. Sabri preaches the "rights" of Arabs to eradicate the Jews whom he
refers to as "pigs and monkeys." And with the backing of the Israeli
government, he ensures that the police enforces his ban on Jewish and
Christian worship on the Temple Mount.

Moreover, under the impotent eye of the government, for the past decade
Sabri has overseen the commission of one of the most heinous archaeological
crimes in human history. While denying the Judeo-Christian sanctity of the
site, since the mid-1990s the Islamic Wakf on the Temple Mount has been
systematically destroying Jewish and Christian relics hidden inside the
mountain that date back to the time of Solomon's Temple, in an attempt to
erase the historical record. Sabri and his colleagues further exploit their
control of the Temple Mount to incite Muslims to attack Jews for imagined
crimes relating to the so-called "Judaization" of Jerusalem.

In answer to reporters' queries, this week Olmert repeatedly stated that he
would never give up the Temple Mount. But his statements are meaningless.
You cannot give up what you already surrendered. No, Olmert is not giving up
the Temple Mount. Olmert is giving up all of Jerusalem.
Dr. Aaron Lerner, Director IMRA (Independent Media Review & Analysis)

Editorial Posting at 12:04 PM
Thursday, 8 June 2006
Israel's Remarkable Economy
Zionsake EditorZionsake Editor: Israel's incredible economy that allows her leaders to "buy" coalition partners to help them to execute their destructive policies - like using more than 50,000 soldiers and policeman to remove around 8,000 settlers from Gaza and recently 10,000 to block all of the Westbank to remove three families from a house (legally owned by Jews) in Hebron. This remarkable economy, compared to that of the to be established, so-called, Palestinian State that has no economy.

PS. A re-settlement program wasn't provided for in the unilateral eviction of Jews from Gaza and northern Shomron. Consequently, to date, 10 months later, 111 families are not yet living even in the temporary "caravilla" pre-fab structures and of the 1,860 people who became unemployed, 1,350 are still not working.
=============
"Arutz 7 Editor" Israel National News Wed, 31 May 2006
Israel Investment News - May, 2006
By IsraelNN Staff

As a public service, Arutz Sheva provides below the May newsletter from the Finance Ministry's Investment Promotion Center.

ONE OF AMERICA'S GREATEST INVESTORS WARREN BUFFETT IN HIS LARGEST INVESTMENT OUTSIDE U.S., BUYS 80% OF ISCAR FOR $4 BILLION

Buffett: "Iscar is an amazing company run by amazing people. I don't get many opportunities to invest in companies like that."

Warren Buffett, labeled the biggest investment guru of all time and his investment company Berkshire Hathaway Inc. announced an agreement to buy 80% of Israeli company Iscar Ltd. for $4 billion.

Iscar Metalworking Companies (IMC) is an industry leader in the metal cutting tools business through its Iscar, TaeguTec, Ingersoll and other IMC group companies. It is owned by the Wertheimer family with operations worldwide. The deal is the largest acquisition ever by Buffett outside the U.S. and the third largest investment ever made by Berkshire.

Buffett said that his investment in Iscar and its management would prove to be one of the most significant things Berkshire had ever done. Talking about Israel, Buffett said that Israel has "amazing people. We are investing $4 billion in an amazing group of people from Israel – and we are investing it at an astounding speed."

The company will continue to be managed by its current management team, headed by Chairman Eitan Wertheimer and President and CEO Jacob Harpaz with headquarters remaining in Tefen, Israel.

Expressing interest in investing in additional Israeli companies, Buffett commented that he is waiting for calls from Israeli companies that meet his criteria.

MORGAN STANLEY LABELS ISRAELI ECONOMY "ALMOST PERFECT"

Investment bank releases glowing report on Israeli economy

In a review on the Israeli economy entitled "Israel, Almost Perfect", U.S. investment bank Morgan Stanley predicted the Bank of Israel's key rate will rise to 5.75% in 2006. The report said that "Israel's new government is good news from the economy and financial markets. The formation of a 'grand' coalition…in the Knesset is a positive development and will help maintain economic stability."

6.6% GROWTH IN ECONOMY IN FIRST QUARTER

Citigroup sees average growth exceeding 4%

A report showed the economy grew 6.6% in the first quarter of 2006, compared with 5.2% in the same period of 2005. The results exceeded previous forecasts. Investments in fixed assets grew by an annualized 16.3%, business product rose by an annualized 10.6% and investments in machinery and equipment rose by 20%. In response to the first quarter figures, Citigroup analysts predict that the average growth for 2006 will be higher than its 4% previously predicted.

NASDAQ TO LAUNCH INDEX OF ISRAELI COMPANIES

Israeli stock index to be the first foreign index on Nasdaq

Nasdaq International Vice President for EMEA, Charlotte Crosswell said that the Nasdaq will launch an Israeli stock index within the next few months. The companies on the index will be weighed on the basis of their market capitalization. This will be the first ever foreign index on the Nasdaq, with Israel boasting more companies listed than any country outside North America.

RED HERRING'S TOP 100 EUROPEAN LIST INCLUDES 17 ISRAELI COMPANIES

Israel ties 2nd place for the largest number of companies on the list

Israel tied with France in the second largest number of companies, after Britain to be listed on Red Herring's top European 100 private technology companies. The companies, judged on innovation and entrepreneurial activities, include D-Pharm, BiolineRX, BitBand, Genova, Altair Semiconductor, Axerra Networks, cVidya Networks, Discretix Technologies, Double Fusion, Gteko Technologies, Negevtech, Power Paper, Siano Mobile Silicon, SpeedBit, Targetize Innovative Solutions, Xeround and Voltaire.

MICROSOFT ANNOUNCES BUYS ISRAELI WHALE COMMUNICATIONS

Microsoft Israel's VP R&D: Microsoft plans to turn the start-up into another Israeli R&D center

Microsoft announced plans to acquire secure sockets layer (SSL) and virtual private networks (VPN) vendor Whale Communications. Whale was listed in international accountancy firm Deloitte Touche’s “Europe Fast 500” list of top companies in 2005. Whale marks Microsoft's first acquisition of an Israeli company since 2001.

BMC SOFTWARE INTERESTED IN FURTHER INVESTING IN ISRAEL

The company's investments in Israel are considered its largest outside the U.S

On a visit to Israel, BMC President and CEO Bob Beauchamp announced that BMC Software would continue investing in Israel on top of the billion dollars it had already spent. Beauchamp was in Israel with other company executives celebrating the company's recent acquisition of Identify Group for $150 million. Jim Grant, the Vice President of BMC Software Service Management Business Unit said that the company's investments in Israel are its largest outside the U.S.

"Our Tel Aviv facility is particularly important because the mainframe talent and technology that we have there is not easily found around the world… We have had tremendous success here and (with) the products they produce and the great technology environment that exists in Israel," he said.

CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT GROUP TO ENTER ISRAELI MARKET

Company establishes fund with Pekan Plus Mutual Funds

Capital International, an investment group with over $300 billion under management, announced it would establish a mutual fund in Israel. This marks the company's first entry into the Israeli market. Capital International signed an agreement with Tel Aviv based Pekan Plus Mutual Funds. The fund will specialize in investments in the US share markets for its Israeli clientele.

IBM ACQUIRES ISRAELI UNICORN SOLUTIONS

Company listed on Red Herring's 100 leading start-ups for 2005

Unicorn Solutions, developers of software for metadata management is being acquired by IBM. The company is based in Jerusalem with a presence in New York.

Unicorn is included in Gartner Group's "visionary quadrant" within its high-level evaluation criteria "Magic Quadrant" and was listed on Red Herring's 100 leading start-ups in 2005. Its employees will join the IBM R&D laboratory in Israel.

FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT REACHES $1.72 BILLION IN MARCH-APRIL

Hi-tech , industry and real estate benefit from investment

The Bank of Israel reported that total direct foreign investment and investment in Israeli securities totaled $1.72 billion for the months of March and April. The hi-tech, industry and real estate sectors benefited most from the investment.

STANDARD AND POORS AND MOODY'S CAST CONFIDENT VOTE ON ISRAELI ECONOMY

"Israeli society and its political and economic decision-makers have shown remarkable resiliency," reported Moody's

Both Moody's Investor Services and credit rating company Standard & Poors (S&P) granted a vote of confidence in the Israeli economy. Moody's Investor Services upgraded its outlook for its international market rating for Israel to "positive". "Israel is exhibiting considerable growth of GDP per capita, moving towards a level more often associated with advanced economies than with developing ones," said the report.

In addition, announcing its credit ratings, S&P retained its A- rating for Israel. It reaffirmed the outlook remains stable.

WARREN BUFFETT INVESTS FURTHER IN ISRAEL

AgroLogic and Cellulogic acquired by Berkshire Hathaway

Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Group announced its subsidiary CTB International Corp. had signed an agreement to buy the controlling interest of Israeli company AgroLogic. The company designs and manufactures integrated systems for cultural use including climate controllers, feed and poultry weighing systems. Cellulogic, AgroLogic's subsidiary which makes warning and control systems was also acquired by CTB International.

Editorial Posting at 1:23 PM
Updated: Thursday, 8 June 2006 1:28 PM
Tuesday, 14 March 2006
Kadima Party:Believes nothing, does nothing for Israel's goodimra-owner@imra.org.il
Tue Mar 14 2006 Volume 2 : Issue 1349 Our worLD: Seinfeld vs. Churchill
[Kadima has no ideology]
Caroline Glick, THE JERUSALEM POST Mar. 13, 2006
www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1139395596710&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowF

Israel's election campaign presents an unparalleled challenge to Israelis
on
both the Right and the Left who care about the issues challenging the
country. Today, not only do they have to defend what they believe, they
also
have to defend their right to believe anything.

Last Friday, Makor Rishon published an in-depth report on the growing
isolation and demonization of the religious Zionist camp. Hebrew
University
sociologist Tamar Elor explained that the front running Kadima Party
presents an impossible challenge for the religious Zionist sector,
represented most prominently by the settlers in Judea and Samaria.

"The settlers are an ideological sector. Kadima, as a party devoid of an
identity, a face, a name or a path, is their polar opposite," she
asserted.

While it has made expelling Israelis from their homes in Judea and
Samaria
its flagship policy, Kadima has no ideology with which religious Zionists
can clash. As a result, Elor maintains that religious Zionists "cannot do
anything against it. They prefer [former far-Left Meretz party leader]
Yossi
Sarid the idealist, ten times more than Kadima which lacks any identity."

For his part, Sarid bemoaned the superficiality of the political climate
cultivated by Kadima in a column in Haaretz on Friday. Sarid exhorted
Israel's intellectuals to make their voices heard arguing, "With men of
letters consistently involved, it will be impossible for a reality to
emerge
where PR men's cannon shells roar out while the muses and their servants
are
silent and silenced."

Kadima's basic sales strategy is to be a party unfettered by content.
Being
a party that stands for nothing means that it can stand for anything any
voter wishes to believe it stands for. An empty shell can be filled with
anything and so can be all things to all people.

LIKUD AND Labor, like the smaller parties across the political spectrum,
are
at a disadvantage in campaigning against Kadima because they all stand
for
something. And since Kadima is not bothered by principle, it has based
its
campaign plan on mocking its rivals for having ideological, political,
religious or social essences around which their policies are based.

The fact that Kadima, which seeks to represent itself as a party of
grown-ups has more in common with Jerry Seinfeld than David Ben-Gurion
was
made fairly clear in a series of interviews and profiles of its prominent
leaders published in the weekend newspapers. Three such articles were
published in Ma'ariv.

First there was a rather creepy interview with Kadima's Deputy Minister
of
the Interior Ruhama Avraham who first rose to prominence in the late
1990s
as then prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu's secretary. As the interview
noted, the most consistent characteristic of Avraham's career has been
her
willingness to exploit, betray and undermine anyone in order to advance
her
career. Avraham makes no bones about her blind ambition. In her words,
"No
one who can't push me ahead is allowed to play to game."

Avraham abandoned her supporters in the Likud Central Committee in favor
of
Sharon's withdrawal and expulsion plan from Gaza. Sharon rewarded her by
appointing her Deputy Minister of the Interior. Avraham recognized that
her
support for Sharon meant that "I wouldn't have a chance [of reelection]
in
the Likud" and so she bolted the party and joined Kadima last November.

Perhaps the most remarkable thing about Avraham, is that in a four page
interview - where she spoke at length about her decision to change her
hair
color from platinum blond to honey, and about her fashion sense which she
says inspired her fellow legislators to pay more attention to their
appearances, and always come to her for a final check before they go
before
the cameras - she never once mentioned any guiding philosophy regarding
the
greater good.

She never mentioned why Israel is worth serving. She never discussed the
dangers Israel must defend against. She only talked about herself. While
admitting that when she became a mother she made a conscious decision to
prefer her career to her family, "knowing my children would suffer for
it,"
Avraham, proudly and eerily announced that she considers herself "the
mother
of the People of Israel."

ASIDE FROM the interview with our dear mother with honey colored hair,
Ma'ariv published a profile of the founder of Kadima, advertising
executive
Reuven Adler. Adler, a graphic artist by training, served as one of
Sharon's
closest political advisors. His competitors denounce him, noting that
during
Sharon's premiership, Adler's PR firm, Adler-Homsky, won the advertising
contracts of such plumb state-owned companies as the Electric Company,
Israel Railroad and Bezeq Telecommunications (before it was privatized).
His
main rival, Ilan Shiloah, was quoted stating, "In the world of
advertising
there is no parallel to the phenomenon of moral corruption called
Adler-Homsky."

As the profile notes, "Adler is credited with the transformation of
Sharon's
image from an extremist, aggressive right winger," (is there any other
kind?), "to a warm and doting grandfather who extends his hand in peace."
His advertising partner Eyal Homsky brags that Adler "created Kadima -
the
name, the logo, the slogan.. It's his baby."

Ma'ariv provided a fairly comprehensive picture of Adler the ad man - who
tells us both what cellular telephone to buy and what party to vote for.
But
while the reader came away from the story knowing about his professional
development and his attitude towards his work, one thing was
conspicuously
absent from the accouNT: what he stands for. Not a word was devoted to
what,
if anything, Adler believes in other than Adler himself.

Finally, Ma'ariv - like every other newspaper in the country, led its
Friday
edition with its "exclusive" interview with Kadima leader and Acting
Prime
Minister Ehud
Olmert. Although Olmert told Ma'ariv, as he told every other newspaper in
the country, that he is planning to destroy many, many Israeli
communities
in Judea and Samaria if he becomes elected and surrender the vast
majority
of the areas, as well as a number of neighborhoods in Jerusalem, to the
Hamas-led Palestinian Authority, he did not once explain how doing so
would
advance Israel's national interests or thwart the global campaign of
jihad.

Olmert said nothing about what Israel represents to him or how he came to
believe what he says he believes in today. Indeed, one of the main
qualities
that he seems to want the public to value in him is his intellectual
shallowness. As he noted to an over-solicitous, pandering interviewer,
"There is no subject that justifies a three hour meeting."

Rather than contend with the serious issues that one would expect a prime
minister to concern himself with, Olmert's most heated, impassioned
comments
related not to policy, but to his rival, Netanyahu.

His criticism of the Likud leader again, did not relate to a policy
matter.
Olmert's attacks on Netanyahu were a page taken from his deputy Shimon
Peres's playbook. Netanyahu, he insinuated, was responsible for Yitzhak
Rabin's assassination because he spoke at an anti-Oslo accords rally.
Now,
by criticizing Olmert's decision to transfer tax revenues to the
Hamas-led
PA and his plan to destroy Israeli communities in order to give the land
they are sitting on the Hamas, Olmert alleged that Netanyahu is inciting
his
murder.

ISRAELIS ARE a people filled with contradictions. On the one hand, we are
one of the most ideologically and historically driven people in the
world.
Jews came here from over one hundred countries, inspired and awakened by
leaders of a different era who sent out the call to return to our ancient
homeland. We have built this country up from the ruins of millennia of
neglect and turned it into the most prosperous, advanced, open and free
society in the Middle East while defending it against acts of aggression
and
war that have continued without interruption for over 120 years. We could
never have accomplished any of these things if we didn't have a deep
seated
belief in ourselves and in our rights and responsibilities as a free
people
in our land.

On the other hand, we are driven by fads. Stars are elevated to the level
of
near deity one day, only to be forgotten the next. The same goes for
everything from fashion lines, hair colors, investment priorities,
marriages, politicians, nightclubs and professions. Since Sharon brought
ad
men like Adler in to run our politics, the same has held true for
ideologies
and values.

On March 28, some 3.5 million Israeli voters will be called upon to
determine what they value. Will they choose substance or will they choose
nothing? Will they demand leaders that model themselves after Winston
Churchill or will they settle for an Israeli Jerry Seinfeld? All we can
do
is wait and watch.

--


remote Editorial Posting at 1:37 PM
Friday, 10 March 2006
Best for Israeli Right is: vote for Likud
Manhigut Yehudit, The Jewish Leadership Movement

Weekly Email Update Mar 9 2006 Volume 66 Number 20

www.jewishisrael.org


Vote With Your Head and Not With Your Heart!

Israel's elections bring a tremendous amount of voter frustration to the
surface. After being ignored and trampled upon for the years between
elections, the average Israeli voter -- and certainly the voters of the
National Camp -- get the feeling that they finally have an opportunity to
express their opinion in a way that counts. Many people vote with their
hearts for the politician whose promises most align themselves with their
own aspirations -- even if those politicians have very little influence
on the Israeli political game. But the question that every voter should
ask himself is not "Which politician will make me feel better?" but
rather, "How can I use my vote to make my opinion political reality?" In
other words, what choice will most effectively influence the political
decisions being made in Israel?

To us, the answer to that question is very clear. It is important to
remember that we did not join the Likud just to garner political
influence. We joined the Likud because it was and remains the most
realistic leadership tool of the Jewish majority (what was once called
the National camp) in Israel. We reached the conclusion that it is
specifically in the Likud that we can steadily progress toward Jewish
leadership for Israel.

We did not sign up new members for the Likud so that we could acquire
members of the Likud Central Committee and political influence. We did it
so that our members could vote for Manhigut's candidate for the head of
the Likud and the leadership of the country. When we started out, we did
not realize the value of the Likud Central Committee. But the more
involved we became in Likud activities, the more we realized that the
Manhigut faction in the Likud and in its Central Committee had achieved
very significant political influence -- stronger than all the Right wing
parties in the Knesset.

Elections are once again approaching. It is imperative that we vote not
with our hearts, but with our heads so that we can acquire the maximum
possible political influence in the most effective place-- the Likud!

Why Vote for the Likud?
Our main emphasis right now is on reaching out to potential voters in the
settlements and convincing them to vote for the Likud. While in the
cities, every 300-400 Likud votes entitles the Likud branch in question
to another representative, in the settlements only 50 votes are needed.
The following is the script of a phone message that the voters in the
settlements will be receiving from Manhigut Yehudit in the approaching
daYS:

"Shalom, this is Moshe Feiglin speaking.

I am a settler, and I'm proud of it! I am calling you because you are
also settlers.

Where did Sharon have the most trouble in passing his Disengagement
plan? In the Knesset? Or in his own party, the Likud?

Who created more political hurdles for him? The Right wing parties?
Or the Likud Central Committee? Do you remember the Likud referendum
on Gush Katif? Do you remember the Likud "rebels"? Who did Sharon
fear more? Them ? Or the Right?

Our unequivocal experience shows that the Likud Central Committee is
a much more effective political tool than the Right wing parties in
the Knesset.

Did you know that every 50 votes for the Likud in the settlements
entitles you to an additional representative in the Likud Central
Committee?

You can vote with your heart and hope that your vote will join with
tens of thousands of votes to possibly put another Knesset member
into the arena that has been proven irrelevant.

Or you can vote Likud and unite your vote with another 49 votes to
put an additional representative into the political arena that counts
-- the Likud Central Committee.

Not only that, but the Right wing parties have a chance to be in the
coalition only if the Likud will form the next government.

Believe me, it's not easy for me, either.

But I vote from my head and not from my heart.

The only real choice is to vote for the Likud."

An additional point to pondER: When the yeshiva high schools, the apple
of the eye of Religious Zionism, needed political help who did they turn
to? The NRP? The National Union? Or to the Likud Central Committee
members? Their wise decision to enlist the help of the Likud Central
Committee members proved most effective.

Better Reasons than Ever to Become Likud Member
Yes, it is very important to become a member of the Likud now. The
important new law passed last week in the Likud Central Committee removes
the vote for the Knesset list from the Central Committee members and
gives it to all Likud members. The MKs will no longer be elected in
Central Committee "deals," but directly by the Likud members. The Likud
members will vote to ensure that people who represent their ideals become
Knesset members. Our chance to create a belief based revolution hinges on
our ability to sign up as many new members as possible to the Likud, so
that they can vote for belief based candidates.

It is important to note that the power of the Central Committee to vote
on ideological issues has been strengthened. The Central Committee will
continue to legislate Likud laws and to shape the ideals of the Likud.
Central Committee members who were in the Committee for its power and
perks (most of them identified with Kadimah) will likely lose interest in
a "perk-free" committee and will probably not even run for a spot on the
Committee in the elections in half a year. On the other hand, Manhigut
Yehudit will, with G-d's help, have a much stronger position in a much
more ideologically motivated Central Committee, where we will have the
ability to progress toward our belief based leadership goals with even
more effectiveness.

And what if the polls are right and the Likud does not form the next
government? It is reasonable to assume that in such a scenario primaries
for the leadership of the Likud will be held in about a year (Netanyahu
may resign, the Knesset may be dissolved, etc.). In the previous
primaries Moshe Feiglin received approximately a third of the votes that
Netanyahu received. Next time, with G-d's help, he will get many more.
Even if we would maintain the 13% of votes that Feiglin received in the
primaries, that would mean the ability to directly elect a number of
excellent people to the Knesset.

Those people who have not yet become members of the Likud are likely
tempted to put it off "until it is relevant." The problem with that is
that 16 months must pass from the time that a person becomes a member to
the time that he can actually vote. So putting off signing up means that
once again, they will be sidelined during critical votes that are coming
our way -- just as happened with the Likud referendum on Gush Katif.

What's it Worth if the Likud is not even in Government?
It is important to remember that Manhigut Yehudit joined the Likud when
it was in the opposition with just 19 Knesset seats. The Prime Minister
at the time was Ehud Barak. Manhigut's Likud Central Committee members
were elected while the Likud was still in the opposition. Not long after,
the political pendulum swung back in the direction of the Likud (after
the Israeli public experienced the tragic results of Oslo) the Likud got
38 Knesset seats and Manhigut found itself with a lot of influence in the
right place. True, it does not seem that the Likud is going to win the
upcoming elections. But experience shows that we can safely assume that
it will return to lead Israel within a reasonable amount of time. The
question is if we will then have the power to create a belief-based
revolution as part of the general political revolution that will take
place. Will we vote now for the Likud so that we can gain power in the
Likud Central Committee? Will we become members of the Likud and sign
others up as well so that we can determine who will be the next leader of
the Likud? The answer is in our hands.

But I Want a Strong and United National Front
Just make a simple calculation. Whoever wants a strong National Union
wants it in the government. Obviously, it will have no significance in
the opposition -- even if it has 15 mandates. The only chance for the
National Union to be in the coalition and to truly influence political
decisions will be if Netanyahu forms the coalition. In other words,
whoever wants a strong and influential National Union should vote for the
Likud.

You can turn the State of Jews into the Jewish State.
Now is the Time!

Join Manhigut Yehudit Today
--


remote Editorial Posting at 4:01 PM
Updated: Friday, 10 March 2006 6:12 PM
Tuesday, 15 November 2005
How the nationalist religious camp in Israel can win
Topic: Israeli Politicians




How to establish a government in Israel that will rule according to Biblical Zionist (rightwing) values
via the Likud Party & Manhigut Yehudit

Moshe Feiglin


Here is your chance to be involved as a non-Israeli in a faction of a political party in Israel that could make a difference to the running of the country. That is, to run it according to Biblical standards without being legalistic about it, or having private agendas, like the religious parties, that have nothing to do with Zionistic ideals or the well-being of the country and Israelis in general.

In the article below, "Eidelberg's Obsession with Feiglin," Shmuel Sackett, International Director of Manhigut Yehudit, explains why it is best for the Israeli rightwing nationalist camp to fight for control via the Likud. The history of the ineffectiveness of new parties in Israel definitely supports Manhigut Yehudit's view that their only chance to establish a nationalist, Bible believing leader and government in Israel is via the Likud, the biggest political party. Arial Sharon also proved this from a failed attempt to make headway in Israeli politics by means of his newly established centrist party (1972) - the blueprint of which he stole from Shmuel Tamir - see The Sharon File. That having been a fiasco, he joined the Likud to build his career -- and then implemented his real policy when he came to power, namely that of the (mostly Freemason) left.

Many Christians tell me they are not interested in politics, they just want to be involved in spiritual things and participate in Jewish religious feasts - some even trying to be more Jewish than Jews in the process. Politics, however, reflects the thinking of the people in general and what really happens in Israel. And one even has to go deeper than Israeli politics to see who pulls the strings from behind the scenes on a global level. Evidence, for instance, shows that the American Council for Foreign Relations (CFR) and their international cohorts control Israeli prime ministers and their policies - including Bibi Netanyahu who gave Hebron to Israel's enemies. The point is therefore to get a leader who fears his God (of Israel) more than the CFR and others who are trying to force Israel into conforming to global instead of Biblical standards.

Please, therefore, check the "Join Manhigut Yehudit Today" link to see whether your joining the Likud as an international member might not add a new active dimension to your involvement with Israel and her (our) God. The membership fee is a bit stiff, but we need to be reminded that supporting Manhigut will make us part of the battle between the "sons of Zion" and the "sons of Greece" (the left) that has been raging for as long the modern state of Israel exists. The outcome will determine whether there will be more Unilateral Disengagements, Oslos, Roadmaps and caving in to Israel's enemies - under or without world pressure. If you don't join Manhigut, I would in any case like to encourage you to take an interest in Israeli politics; subscribe to some newsletters, like Manhigut's, Arutz-7, etc. - it will show you what to pray for.

Prof. Eidelberg nevertheless has most of the answers when it comes to the reform of Israel's flawed electoral system and the way judges are appointed in the courts. See Below. (Please visit Holy Land Inc. Sites to find tons of information about Israel on a broad range of subjects)
Philip Blom
Zionsake

-------------------------------------

Eidelberg's Obsession with Feiglin
By Shmuel Sackett, International Director, Manhigut Yehudit
editor@jewishisrael.org www.jewishisrael.org
Cheshvan 5766 (Nov, 05)

For the last month, Professor Paul Eidelberg has written -- and spoken -- virtually non stop about Moshe Feiglin. He has stated, over and over and over again how staying in the Likud is a waste of time and counter productive. In his recent Arutz-7 radio interview, entitled "Why Recruiting People Into The Likud Means More Oslo," Professor Eidelberg even went so far as to say; "to register for the Likud, to give one's name to such a party is more than dishonorable -- it makes a mockery of the 10,000 Jews left homeless by that party."

Professor Eidelberg states that none of his attacks on Moshe Feiglin are personal and actually testifies to Feiglin's "impeccable character." Furthermore, he extends "both hands in friendship to him and his followers." Professor Eidelberg demands he be listened to since he calls himself an expert in Israeli politics, "having lectured in universities for three decades" and "having written hundreds of articles and books on the subject of Israeli politics".

Let's now take a look at the facts.

Professor Paul Eidelberg is the President of the Yemin Yisrael Political Party in Israel. This party was founded in 1996 by Miriam Lapid, after the tragic murder of her husband and son, and by former Moledet Knesset member Shaul Gutman. Yemin Yisrael ran for the Knesset in the elections held on May 29, 1996. 44,604 votes were needed as a minimum to get elected to the Knesset and the Yemin Yisrael leaders ran around Israel promising victory. Many thousands of people voted for this party, yet Yemin Yisrael did NOT pass the minimum, and thousands of right wing votes wound up in the garbage.

On May 17, 1999 elections were held once again for the Knesset and a united right-wing bloc was formed; Herut, Moledet and Tekuma. The Yemin Yisrael party did NOT join together in this bloc and, once again, ran on its own. This time 49,672 votes were needed as a minimum and although they couldn't get 44,000 votes in '96 they assured the people of Israel that they would pass the minimum. Once again many thousands of people believed them and voted Yemin Yisrael and, once again, the precious votes were wasted.

On January 28, 2003 elections were held yet again for the Knesset. Shortly before, the Professors for a Strong Israel, issued the following press releaSE:

Statement to the Press -- December 11, 2002

RE: Stop this factionalism, stop wasting votes!

Professors for a Strong Israel calls on the small parties in the National Camp to give up their efforts at running separately. These are parties that have no hope of amassing the minimum number of votes needed for the Knesset representation, but that can still waste thousands of precious votes that the larger parties of the Right should be getting. The small parties must join the larger parties that also oppose a Palestinian state west of the Jordan and that are sure to pass the minimum.

This call is addressed in particular to Michael Kleiner's Herut, to Paul Eidelberg's Yemin Yisrael, to Yosef Ba-Gad's Moreshet Avot and to Moshe Green's Tzomet. We recall that in 1992 the splintered National Camp garnered more votes than did the Left, but the Left won nonetheless and brought the country the Oslo disaster.

Professors for a Strong Israel urges voters of the National Camp not to waste their votes on fly-by-night party lists that have no hope of sitting in the Knesset.

What did Professor Eidelberg do? He united his party together with Herut and ran together with them. On the eve of the elections I spoke to an excited supporter who was told by party leaders that this new union; Herut and Yemin Yisrael, would get 4-6 seats. The minimum required was 47,226 and they were predicting votes in excess of 100,000.

Once again, reality proved otherwise to these "political experts". Over 40,000 votes were in fact secured but the Herut-Yemin Yisrael party fell 5,000 votes short. The fears of the Professors for a Strong Israel came to fruition as over 40,000 right wing votes became totally useless.

After three miserable political failures -- and 70,000 wasted votes -- Professor Eidelberg is once again telling us he knows best. In a recent article, dated Oct 16, 2005 entitled "Pitfalls of the Jewish Leadership Movement" Professor Eidelberg states that he now favors creating a large party. (What happened to all the years he was in support of small parties???) His mathematical equation for success is the followiNG: Take Likud voters who "feel betrayed" and add that to the "obvious failure of National Union and the National Religious Party" and you can get... (ready for this one???) "750,000 votes -- enough for 30 seats"!!!! (Note: I am not making this up! This is a quote from his article, (Click here to see for yourself). In other words, Professor Paul Eidelberg, who never passed the minimum number of votes needed, has never even won ONE Knesset seat and is virtually unknown amongst the Hebrew speaking population in Israel is now predicting THIRTY seats in the next election! This is a political expert???

Dearest readers; Nobody ever said taking control over Likud would be easy. Moshe Feiglin never promised instant gratification. Not one Manhigut Yehudit leader ever claimed to be an expert in anything. All we ask is that you consider the followiNG:

In less than six months, primaries will be held within Likud to determine who will be the leader of the party and, in essence, the Prime Minister of the State of Israel. As of this writing, four men are running in that race; Ariel Sharon, Bibi Netanyahu, Uzi Landau and Moshe Feiglin. Which of those four men would you like to see as Prime Minister? Most people I ask that question to answer, "Moshe Feiglin." There's only one problem; If you are not a member of Likud you cannot vote for him!! Imagine thAT: FINALLY, you have an opportunity to throw Sharon out and make sure he is not replaced by one of his political clones and you can't do it because Professor Eidelberg convinced you not to join Likud!

But there's more! Within two months after primaries for party leadership, the Likud will hold its internal elections to determine the order of its Knesset list. 3,000 people -- all members of the Likud "Central Committee" -- will vote for that Knesset list. Each one of those 3,000 people was elected by members of the Likud party in regional elections. This means that if you are a member of Likud you have a voice in determining who sits in the Knesset for that party! Will it continue to be Meir Sheetreit, Ehud Olmert and Tzippi Livni or will it be Michoel Fuah, Motti Carpel and Nitza Kahane? If you feel that joining Likud is like eating "treif" then you had better get your signs ready because you will be protesting the government for the next 50 years! You will march with the Yesha Council to places like Kfar Maimon, you will sleep on hilltops, you will get arrested, you will say Tehillim with 250,000 other people at the Kotel and you will go on 13 hunger strikes but when you are given an opportunity to make a change and FINALLY change the direction of Israel's ruling party you will be home sleeping, following the advice of political experts who told you to vote for small parties, then big ones, then medium ones, then back to small ones...

Professor Eidelberg; Let's stop the attacks on the National Union, NRP and Manhigut Yehudit. It's counter-productive! Let's work together towards what we all want; An authentic Jewish State in the Land of Israel. Let's figure out how different personalities who share a common dream can work together; Effi Eitam, Benny Elon, Nadia Matar, David HaIvri, Moshe Feiglin, Aryeh Eldad, Mike Guzofsky, Michoel Kleiner, Ketzele, Baruch Marzel, Daniella Weiss etc... These people all want the same thing but have different ways of getting there. Let's pool our resources and work together, some from the inside and some from the outside. Let's become a team where not every body is the quarterback but every one is aiming for the goal line. This will make our political power stronger, our message clearer and our followers excited! This will insure the fact that no votes are ever wasted! By working inside Likud we pressure the leadership party to move in the direction we want. By simultaneously -- and in full coordination -- working outside Likud we apply a "full court press" and grab away many Knesset seats from parties who do not share our common vision. By working on the grass roots level we educate our youth and involve people on a regular basis.

Nothing will ever be gained by working alone and thinking of ourselves as "experts." Hashem gave His nation many talents and we must use all of them to achieve success. The path that Manhigut Yehudit has chosen is clear to everyone but we will work with all other groups in a united front for the good of the Jewish People. In short, since we share the DREAM... let's become a TEAM!



Zionsake




remote Editorial Posting at 6:16 PM
Updated: Friday, 10 March 2006 6:26 PM
Friday, 10 June 2005
Jews will Murder Jews in Gaza as in Europe
Topic: Conspiracy
"Barry Chamish" chamish@netvision.net.il
THEY DO SO MURDER JEWS by Barry Chamish www.barrychamish.com

Israelis, mostly, cannot accept that their leadership is planning to dismember their nation beginning with Gush Katif. And more than anything else, they cannot believe that Jews would be responsible for the deaths of untold numbers of fellow Jews.
The explanation I have offered in my new book Shabtai Tzvi, Labor Zionism And The Holocaust, is that Judaism has been infiltrated by the secret followers of the 16th Century false messiah Shabtai Tzvi and his second coming in the form of Jacob Frank, whose 18th Century Frankist movement resulted in the establishment of Labor Zionism.
The Frankists believe in an anti-Judaism, whose tenets consider the murder of true Torah-believing Jews, as a mitzvah.
Too incredible to believe, right? So why don't we look at a piece of 20th Century history? Let us examine the slaughter of Croatian Jews by Frankist "Jews" like Pavelic and Kvaternik.

http://www.pavelicpapers.com/index.html

The Party of Right was doomed to remain on the fringe of Croatian national politics within the Empire. But it was an attractive ideology when it was discovered by a young lawyer from Bradina, a small village in present-day Bosnia-Hercegovina, named Ante Pavelic.
Ante Pavelic rose through the ranks of the Party of Right after the incorporation of Croatia into the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes, later to be renamed Yugoslavia. He led the far right-wing of what was already a right-wing party - the "Frankist" faction, so named after Josip Frank, a singularly intolerant man despite his ethnic background as an assimilated Jew.

On January 6, 1929, King Alexander Karadjordjevic declared his personal dictatorship. Among those who sought refuge abroad was Ante Pavelic. After drifting rather aimlessly through Vienna, he established a relationship with Ivan "Vancia" Mihailov's faction of the Internal Macedonian Revolutionary Organization (IMRO), a terrorist organization founded more than thirty years before aimed at establishing Bulgarian hegemony in Macedonia. It is believed that Mihailov recommended Pavelic to Italian duce Benito Mussolini, who soon became patron, providing funds and training at a camp near Siena to what Pavelic christened his ustase.

From the beginning, Pavelic had quite naturally adopted Starcevic and Frank's ideology for his own movement. As with the Italian Fascists, the Ustase was at its origins xenophobic, and author Stella Alexander's description of some articles in the Croatian Catholic press from this time as "unpleasantly anti-Semitic but in a traditional, pre-Hitlerian way" fits the Ustase as well. Ante Pavelic's own wife, Mara Lovrencic, came from a family of assimilated Viennese Jews, and his chief aide in exile, Dido Kvaternik, was related to Josip Frank. Nevertheless, the movement became both overtly and violently anti-Semitic when the center of gravity for the militant right shifted from Rome to Berlin and Hitler's Nazi Party.

Four days later, Slavko Kvaternik - Dido Kvaternik's father and the elder statesman of the Ustase movement - declared the Independent State of Croatia in the name of the poglavnik (a Croatian equivalent of duce or fuehrer) Ante Pavelic. Consolidated by Italian and German troops, Pavelic established himself in Zagreb and immediately unleashed a column of fire on the Serbian population. Aspiring to form an ethnically pure paradise out of a state in which Croats were, in fact, a minority, he was advised by Hitler not to show too much pity. "If the Croat state wishes to be strong," he told his pupil, "a fifty year policy of intolerance must be pursued, because too much tolerance on such issues can only do harm."
Within weeks, Pavelic's bloodiest henchman, Vjekoslav "Maks" Luburic, began laying the groundwork for Jasenovac, the largest concentration camp in Southern Europe. Peasant Party leader Vladko Macek, who had originally welcomed the Ustase's formation of the Independent State of Croatia, found himself among the first internees at Jasenovac and watched as Croatia's Jewish population along with untold numbers of Serbs, Roma, and political dissidents passed through the gates on their way to extermination. Macek was later released to serve under house arrest.

All told, the Simon Wiesenthal Center has estimated that at least 30,000 Jews (75% of the pre-war population), 29,000 Roma (97%) and 600,000 Serbs - or about one-third of the pre-war population - were murdered in the four years of the Independent State of Croatia's existence. Yet there was no equivalent of Nuremburg for the Ustase.

Pavelic made his way from Austria to Italy, where he and many other high-ranking Ustase sought shelter in the Monastery of San Girolamo degli Illrici under the protection of a former Ustase official and priest, Father Krunoslav Draganovic. Agents at American Army's Counter-Intelligence Corps (CIC) tracked Pavelic's movements and prepared for his arrest before they were, inexplicably at the time, ordered to cease and desist by their superiors. It is clear from reading their reports today, particularly those written by the only surviving member of the Rome CIC team, William Gowen, that the Americans had taken over what was termed the "Ratline" (after the highest point on a mast where sailors would seek shelter on a sinking ship) from the Vatican. Draganovic became a precious American asset and most of the Ustase who made it as far as Italy were able to escape to South America, Spain and, in Artukovic's case, to the United States. In one of his final reports before being transferred from the Rome branch of the CIC, Gowen wrote that "Pavelic's contacts are so high and his present position is so compromising to the Vatican, that any extradition of Subject would deal a staggering blow to the Roman Catholic Church."

There you have it. Frankist anti-Jews took control of Croatia and slaughtered 75% of the country's Jews. But not only were the Jews murdered, they were robbed at death by Pavelic and his thugs, of at least $100 million in cash, gold, jewels and valuables. There are people trying to recover the loot. http://www.vaticanbankclaims.com
http://www.remnantofgod.org/breaking-news.htm

Unfortunately, none of them will be Israeli anymore. On June 5.05, the Knesset committee responsible for compensating Holocaust victims, headed by Reuven Rivlin, was disbanded. A week before, Haaretz estimated the number of Israelis who suffered under Nazi Occupation to be a surprisingly high 435,000. Their government would no longer seek justice for their losses. Incredibly, Rivlin explained the reason for breaking up the committee was because it was complicating negotiations with the Palestinians.
So where is the Jewish money stolen by the Nazis? On April 18/05, the National Post of Canada provided a most disturbing explanation. It appeared in a review of the British Channel Four program called The Final Insult, by George Jonas. The contention made is that in 1998-99, Charles Bronfman, on behalf of his World Jewish Congress won $6.25 billion from Swiss banks in a series of legal actions. However:

Disbursements are made to agencies and institutions of the organizers' choice, while some
survivors receive little or nothing...

Scholars like Dr. Brian King of Oxford have raised similar questions. "On the face of it, a small
number of scholars are deciding, on behalf of all Jewry, who gets what. Where is the
accountability?"

The answer is, there is none. The Frankist Bronfman can pick the pockets of the millions dead and the Israeli government will make sure no one asks for their fair share.
Lest you believe that he Croatian Holocaust created by the Frankists in alliance with the Vatican is inapplicable to our times, think again.
The Philadelphia Trumpet is a quirky but interesting Christian publication. In their June 2005 issue, they published a quite masterful expose of the Vatican's real manipulations in Europe. I briefly quote from it: www.thetrumpet.com

In June 1991, Croatia and Slovenia declared independence. By December of that year, against overwhelming opposition from the rest of the world, Germany moved to give Croatia and Slovenia its full backing as separate nations...The Vatican speedily followed Germany with public recognition...A horrible illegal war ensued sanctioned by the UN, EU and Vatican, which readily stood by while NATO won...

But such German/Vatican bloodletting is a mere prelude, remaining "high on the Vatican agenda, with, above all, the retaking of Jerusalem remaining the plum."

Shall we recall that against all sentiments in the country, the Israeli government supported Croatia over the Serbs? It even sent Yossi Sarid to Sarajevo to assess the scene. He ran home crying when he found out that he could get hurt there. By supporting Croatia, the Israeli secret leadership was paying homage to their fellow Frankists, Pavelic and the Kvaterniks.
And the trickery goes on. One of my central claims is that the Vatican agent currently in charge of blinding the Jews into submission is King Juan Carlos of Spain, who actually believes he is the true Guardian Of The Holy Sites Of Jerusalem. He's throwing a little wingding with all the folks conspiring with Israel's powerbrokers to put an end to the Jewish state:

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1117678726998
His Majesty Juan Carlos I, King of Spain, will open this year's event, which will focus on practical steps to combat intolerance, building upon last year's Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe Conference on Anti-Semitism in Berlin and Conference on Racism, Xenophobia and Discrimination in Brussels. The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe comprises 55 nations, including the United States, Canada and the countries of Europe and Eurasia.

http://washingtontimes.com/world/20...94209-9080r.htm

Anti-hate envoys

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice yesterday named New York Gov. George E. Pataki to head a U.S. delegation of Christian, Muslim and Jewish leaders to a European summit on discrimination next week.

The Conference on Anti-Semitism and Other Forms of Intolerance is sponsored by the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), a 55-nation body that includes the United States, Canada, Russia, Europe and Central Asia. King Juan Carlos of Spain is scheduled to open the two-day conference on June 8 in Madrid.

As one reader emphatically notes:

In the June 8-9 Cordoba, Spain event we see coordination at the highest levels between:

U.S. Oil and Banking Establishment
"Saudi" Wahhabi Establishment
European/Vatican Establishment

As usual, the Jews will be the sacrifice on the altars of each group above, and, as usual, the Jews do not have the faintest idea what is happening to them.

The Frankist leaders of Jewry are preparing to expel the Jews of Gush Katif, and they will murder them if push comes to shove. Either way, they will rob them of all their hard-earned assets right after.
The names have changed from Pavelic and Kvaternik to Peres, Wolfensohn, Wolfowitz, Fischer etc. but the methods have not.

end

I would be helpless without my readers. Not only did Jim and Betty Searcy give me a four day vacation in Cyprus last week, but Jim provided me with his Pavelic research. And it was Dr. Reuven Lexier, who rushed the National Post review to me.

To my Hebrew readership. Three sites to view and let others view.

www.yigalamir.com
http://ps.newsnet.co.il/Front/Tools/homepage.asp
http://chamish.inopsys.com/

For my Christian readership:

http://www.dccsa.com/greatjoy/


remote Editorial Posting at 4:57 PM
Updated: Thursday, 29 September 2005 6:16 PM
Tuesday, 7 June 2005
Israeli Position Renders Balfour Declaration Obsolete

Arutz-7 Editor Arutz-7 News: Monday, May 2, 2005
Lawyers representing Israel in its bid to defend the
Evacuation/Compensation Law (the Disengagement Plan), negate the Balfour
Declaration as a basis for Jews to settle in Judea, Samaria, and Gaza.



The lawyers made their controversial legal point in a brief submitted to the
High Court of Justice, which is hearing some 10 petitions submitted against
the disengagement plan.

The Balfour Declaration was issued in 1917 by the British Government, which
controlled the Holy Land - including Jordan - at the time. The document,
which was later confirmed by the League of Nations, states, "His Majesty's
Government views with favor the establishment in Palestine of a national
home for the Jewish people..."

This declaration gave the Zionist movement a legal jump-start, and inspired
the Jews to build their national homeland throughout the Land of Israel west
of the Jordan River. Even after the UN Partition Plan gave away parts of the
Land and assigned them to a new Arab state that never arose, Israel did not
give up its claim on these areas. In fact, in the War of Independence, it
conquered some of them and incorporated them in the emerging State. Areas
included in this category include Be'er Sheva, the Beit Shemesh area, and
much of the Galilee.

The State's legal team's brief of today states, "The petitioners' claim that
the [Balfour Declaration] is valid for all of the Mandatory Land of Israel -
even those areas that were not given to Israel or to Jordan or did not
become an independent state - is not comprehensible."

By taking this position, the Government of Israel is essentially saying that
Israel has no claim on anything other than the Partition Plan borders. So
states Shimon HaLevi, a legal expert who is taking part in the legal battle
against the disengagement plan. HaLevi says that the Government basically
renders the Balfour Declaration obsolete and irrelevant, and has "thus
adopted not only a leftist position, but the position of our worst enemies."

"In essence," HaLevi told Arutz-7 today, "this returns us to the 1947
Partition borders, which are three small areas in the north, west and south
connected by a safe passage."

HaLevi said that legal experts around the world have determined that in
light of the Balfour Declaration, the Jewish communities of Yesha (Judea,
Samaria and Gaza) cannot be considered illegal. In a press conference on
Feb. 2, 1981, HaLevi said, then-U.S. President Ronald Reagan stated, "I
disagreed when the previous administration referred to them [settlements] as
illegal - they're not illegal."

Tomorrow, an 11-justice panel of the Supreme Court will hold its second
hearing on the petitions against the disengagement/giveaway plan. Atty.
Yossi Fuchs, representing some of the petitioners, told Arutz-7 that in the
previous session, "Chief Justice Barak assigned only a half-hour to each
petition, hoping to finish the whole thing in one shot. This is scandalous,
because when [Arabs] file petitions, they get 7-8 sessions... In the last
session, we didn't finish everything, so they had to hold a second session.
The Supreme Court is trying to get this over with as fast as possible, and
we're trying to prevent that."

Fuchs said he is surprised as to how far to the political left the State is
actually going. He expressed slight optimism regarding what the Court might
grant the petitioners in terms of times of evacuation, alternative housing
and financial issues - "but regarding the fundamental issue of the
disengagement itself, there are only slim chances that we will achieve
anything with this Court, as only one judge opposes the disengagement."


remote Editorial Posting at 8:57 PM
Bush and the (1949) Auschwitz borders

http://goisraelgo.blogspot.com/

The truth. For a change. Fight media bias. Make the truth be known.

Sunday, May 29, 2005
Could Kerry have said this?

I wrote earlier about some recent quotes from US president Bush. Other people also noted the enormity of his statements.
The most unsettling, if not shocking remark by the president was a direct reference to the 1949 "Armistice lines" agreed to by Israel and Jordan at the end of the War of Independence. Those lines, the famous "Auschwitz borders" as they were called by the late Israeli Labor-party statesman Abba Eban, leaves Israel's heavily populated coastal plain, just 9-11 miles from the border of what would be Palestine.

Not only are none of the major settlement blocs in Judea and Samaria, such as Ma'ale Adumim included in those borders, but neither are the Western Wall, the Old City of Jerusalem, the Jerusalem neighborhoods of Ramot, Gilo, Neve Yaakov, East Talpiot, Pisgat Ze'ev (to name a few), nor the Jerusalem-Tel Aviv highway (Route 1) as it crosses into the Latrun area.

Yet President Bush, standing next to the man whom he would like to become the first president of Palestine, told Abbas and the rest of the world, that the reference point for negotiating the future boundary between the two states was the 1949 lines, and that any change to that border "must be mutually agreed to" between Israel and the Arabs.

In other words, as far as Bush is concerned, Abbas must approve Israel's annexing the Western Wall or even part of the Tel-Aviv-Jerusalem highway to the Jewish State. Conversely, without his agreement, those areas are slated to be part of an independent State of Palestine.

Where then, is the great quid-pro-quo for the Gaza withdrawal, the highly-touted and heavily-marketed Bush promises to Sharon that the U.S. recognizes the facts on the ground in Judea and Samaria, the settlement blocs that preclude a withdrawal to the 1949 Armistice lines?
Good question. Where is the quid-pro-quo? I'll tell you: IT IS IN THE TOILET. Where Sharon belongs.

The Americans are our friends only slightly more than Saudi Arabia is. Israel must take back Gaza. Now.

And I'm beginning to fear I owe an apology to those I called dumbasses for favoring Kerry over Bush. Talk about flip-flops. This makes me physically ill.

posted by Daniel at Sunday, May 29, 2005 - PermaLink


remote Editorial Posting at 11:32 PM
U.S. State Dept's Pro-Palestinian Policy
"Israel Resource News Agency" media@actcom.co.il Sun, 05 Jun 2005

http://www.worldjewishnewsagency.org/mounting_a_citizens_challenge__s.htm
Mounting a Citizens Challenge
by David Bedein

American citizens often ask what they can do for Israel when they are
in touch with their Congressional representatives.

Perhaps the most important thing they can do is to challenge the Ten
Principles of The U.S. State Department's 2005 Middle East agenda,
which includes:

1 The cutting of Israel in half by advocating that the proposed PLO
entity be "contiguous" ? in the words of Secretary Condoleeza Rice ?
from Gaza to Bethlehem.

2 Ignoring the PLO's decision not to annul the PLO covenant, which
mandates that the PLO continue its state of war against Israel. This
covenant continues despite a firm American commitment not to deal
with the PLO until it cancels the covenant.

3 Financing a Palestinian school system that operates the first
curriculum since the Third Reich that teaches children to make war
against Jews. (Review the Palestinian curriculum at www.edume.org)

4 Allowing PLO leadership to order the murder of Palestinian
dissidents. A total of 51 Arabs are currently facing death for the
"crime" of cooperating with Israel. The State Department has said it
will not intervene to stop this practice.

5 Vetoing Israel's right to build homes or synagogues in the Jewish
Quarter of the Old City of Jerusalem. The State Department's answer
as to whether the repair of the Hurva Synagogue in the Jewish
Quarter, destroyed by the Arab legion in 1948, would represent an act
of "illegal settlement activity" was "yes."

6 Rejecting the idea that Jerusalem is even part of Israel. Most
recently, President Bush, on the advice of the State Department,
vetoed a bill that would require U.S. documents issued in Jerusalem
to list "Jerusalem, Israel", as their point of origin. Currently all
such documents are listed as "Jerusalem", with no country mentioned.
They include U.S. passports and birth certificates issued for
American citizens who dwell or were born in the western sector
Jerusalem.

7 Nurturing Muhammad Dahlan, as coordinator of PLO security forces,
despite the fact that Dahlan has taken credit for planning the
murders campaign which took the lives of hundreds of Jews (See
Israeli Deputy Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's article in the Wall
Street Journal of June 3, 2002, documenting Dahlan's murder record,
where Olmert called for his elimination).

8 Ordering renewal of CIA training for the PLO security forces,
despite the fact that these same PLO forces have used the CIA
training they received in the 1990's to murder Jews since the
September 2000 inception of organized terror warfare against Israel.

9 Continuing to fund the "right of return" campaign of the UNRWA
Palestinian Arab refugee camps, despite the President's clear
statement on April 14, 2004 that he opposed such policies.

10 Recognizing Palestinian Authority Chairman Abu Mazen (a.k.a.
Mahmoud Abbas) as a "moderate" influence, even though he has armed
and incorporated every terrorist group instead of disarming them and
defining the election of Mazen as "democratic", despite the
resignation of 46 members of the PLO?s own election council on the
night of the elections.

The role of the Congress to "Advise and Consent" on matters of
foreign policy is defined by the U.S. Constitution. It is up to
American citizen supporters of Israel to work with the Congress to
"advise" the State Department so that they do not "consent" to its
Middle East policy agenda.

David Bedein is the Bureau Chief of the Jerusalem-based Israel
Resource News Agency

remote Editorial Posting at 11:32 PM
Saturday, 28 May 2005
AIPAC leaders' whitewash of the evil leftist Israeli policies

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/article.php3?id=5154
AIPAC of Lies
by Beth Goodtree
May 26, '05

The AIPAC conference
For a group that ostensibly supports Israel, all I saw from the AIPAC leadership was support for a failing political policy that demonizes Jews and rewards terror. I was so inundated with brainwashed rhetoric it was like being covered in camel dung. I should have brought toilet paper.

For some unknown reason, the AIPAC leaders seem to be more of a rubber stamp than representing a true advocacy group, which is a shame. This lack of backbone goes against the very meaning of AIPAC's name: American-Israel Public Affairs Committee.

How is it a rubber stamp?

The year is 2004. Disengagement is on everyone's mind. A group sincerely dedicated to public affairs would have presented speakers from both sides of the issue. But not AIPAC. Natan Sharansky begged to speak at last year's conference and was unceremoniously turned down.

Why?

Because Sharansky wanted to warn that giving up Jewish land to a group of terrorists who had no intention of having a true democracy was a roadmap to disaster for Israel.

The AIPAC leaders didn't want to let this public figure speak. It went against their personal agenda -- which was to foist their preferred program of disengagement on the world in general and Israelis in particular. This despite the fact that many Israelis, as well as Diaspora Jews, were very much against giving away Jewish historic and holy land while evicting Jews as a reward for terror to an entire society bent upon committing Jewish genocide. (1)
So what are the AIPAC lies? Here are a few:

AIPAC Lie #1
"The peace process will only succeed if Israel disengages..." (2)
Truth # 1
The Arabs were bombing Israel, hijacking planes and murdering Jews long before and right up to the time that the Jews turned empty, barren, uninhabited land into thriving towns.

AIPAC Lies #2 & #3
"US aid enhances the prospects for peace by making clear to Israel's would-be adversaries that there is no military alternative to negotiations." (2)
Truth #2
US aid to Israel has been going on for decades and it hasn't convinced Israel's enemies that there is no alternative to negotiations. Since the year 2000, there have been 22,000 attacks on Israelis. (2)
Truth #3
US aid to Israel is being counteracted by US aid to the very people attacking Israel. This includes the billions of dollars given to the Arabs occupying Jewish Palestine as well as to their aiders and abettors -- the Egyptians -- who are waging a blood libel and hate campaign against Jews and Israel.

AIPAC Lie #4
"Israel's withdrawal from Gaza will mean that 1.3 million Palestinians will no longer be subject to Israeli jurisdiction." (2)
Truth #4
Israel does not have jurisdiction over these Arabs now. They had elections, and they have their own laws, courts, security forces and police. If Israel supposedly has jurisdiction over these people than what is Abbas doing in Washington talking to Bush, since he has no jurisdiction? You can't have it both ways.

AIPAC Lie #5
"Nearly 430,000 West Bank Palestinians will no longer be under Israel's security control." (2)
Truth #5
They aren't under Israeli jurisdiction now. If these Arabs/Muslims were under Israeli security control, there would be no barrage of missiles -- like the 60 Kassam rockets landing in a two-day period last week. There would be no shootings at nursery schools and playgrounds (a nefarious attempt to exterminate the future generation of Jews), no shootings at commuters and no genocide/homicide bombers.

Yet even if there is a disengagement, the Arabs -- like any other foreigners visiting any other country -- will be required to go through some form of customs checkpoint/barrier.

So here we have AIPAC lying at every turn to justify ethnic cleansing based upon religion and national origin. I find this ironic since most of the AIPAC members I spoke to are Democrats and liberal. How hypocritical of their leadership to promote ethnic cleansing when it is supposedly the liberals who support human rights.

However, I was not surprised to see Manhigut Yehudit's co-founder -- Shmuel Sackett -- in attendance. Manhigut Yehudit, as well as its most famous member and other co-founder, Moshe Feiglin (who was not at the conference), are adamantly opposed to the disengagement and ethnic cleansing. Both are also observant Jews and so I wrongly assumed that Manhigut's, Feiglin's and Sackett's position to be a lost cause among the less observant AIPAC crowd.

Ariel Sharon & Co. have continuously painted Feiglin, Sackett and Manhigut Yehudit as radical religious right-wingers. Therefore, an AIPAC conference, addressed by Sharon and attended by mostly non-observant, middle-of-the-road, liberal American Jews was not the place I expected Manhigut Yehudit to find a receptive welcome.

Yet they got a surprisingly warm reception among the conference attendees. Contrary to Mr. Sharon portraying people who want to keep their homes, lands and businesses as radicals, these conference attendees saw them as victims putting up a justified fight against ethnic cleansing, bullying and threats of imprisonment. It made me wonder why the AIPAC leadership is so out of touch with reality and their own membership.

These non-observant, liberal Jews -- the AIPAC members themselves -- were highly receptive to Shmuel Sackett as representing the settlers and Feiglin's position on disengagement and Israel's governance. To my chagrin, my surprise was from automatically believing the insidious propaganda put forth by the Sharon government, that non-religious Jews would reject religious ones as potential leaders.

In direct opposition to the Sharon government's intimations that a religious political party would try to force the non-religious to become observant, Sackett, as a representative of Manhigut Yehudit, showed that all Jews are welcomed for whom they are. Having met Sackett, many of the AIPAC attendees came to see through this Sharon government lie. By the end of the conference, they saw Manhigut Yehudit, Feiglin and Sackett as people with whom they had much in common -- what's best for Israel as well as Jews from all walks of life and degrees of observance.

How do I know this? Sackett was handing out plain orange buttons to be worn as a low-key symbol of opposition to the ethnic cleansing of disengagement. I saw many people wearing them. I also witnessed many people who did not wear them come up to Shmuel Sackett and tell him that they were in support of the settlers and Manhigut's platform but were afraid to show it at a conference with over-the-top security that was meant in part to stifle opposition.

This was demonstrated when Sackett stood up during Sharon's talk of what a wonderful thing disengagement was. Sackett, a resident of an area slated to be ethnically cleansed said, "We're not leaving. Prime Minister Sharon will not take me out of my home. Soldiers will not drag my children out of their homes." He was manhandled out of the conference.

Then a woman, Tova Abady, also a resident slated to be ethnically cleansed, stood up and stated, "I live in Gush Katif. I am not leaving. I am staying in my home." Although willing to calmly leave, I saw her roughly dragged/carried out of the conference and sustained back and neck injuries from her treatment.

Even before the conference started I myself, was taken out of my seat and put into a separate area where I was constantly watched by several large men and told not to walk around (everyone else was allowed to, though). This was most likely because I had been seen talking to Shmuel Sackett and his crew earlier in the morning at his hotel.

So while the AIPAC conference ended up being a big ego stroke for the leaders and Sharon, it was hardly representative of the membership or the Jewish people and was designed to suppress opposition to ethnic cleansing. Perhaps AIPAC really stands for American-Israel 'Politiganda' and Crapola...

End Notes

(1) (June 2004 poll) http://www.jmcc.org/publicpoll/results/2004/index.htm

(2) Quote taken from the 2005 AIPAC Conference handouts.

remote Editorial Posting at 12:30 PM

Newer | Latest | Older